Which aspect is crucial for ensuring the integrity of evidence in court?

The integrity of evidence in a court of law is fundamentally based on the relevance and reliability of that evidence. Relevance refers to how closely the evidence pertains to the case at hand, helping to establish the facts needed for judicial determination. Reliability speaks to the credibility and trustworthiness of the evidence, ensuring that it is a reliable basis for the court's decision-making process.

When evidence is both relevant and reliable, it enhances the likelihood that it will be accepted by the court, which is essential for supporting the claims or defenses presented by either party. This integrity is vital not only for upholding justice but also for maintaining the overall credibility of the judicial system.

The emphasis on quantity of evidence, while it may seem that having more evidence could strengthen a case, is not as important as ensuring that the presented evidence is pertinent and trustworthy. Similarly, while technology can play a significant role in how evidence is collected or presented, the crucial factor remains the evidential integrity established through relevance and reliability. Lastly, witness availability, while important for testimonies, does not directly influence the integrity of physical evidence presented in court, which is the focus of this question.