Which of the following describes intentional infliction of emotional distress?

Intentional infliction of emotional distress refers to a situation where an individual deliberately engages in extreme or outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional pain or distress to another person. This definition focuses on the intent and the severity of the actions taken.

When evaluating the correct choice, it is important to note that the emphasis is on the conduct being extreme and the intention behind it being to cause emotional harm. This aligns with the legal understanding that for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress to be valid, the behavior must be beyond the bounds of decency and must result in significant distress to the victim.

In contrast, causing emotional harm through negligent behavior lacks the deliberate intent to inflict distress and typically refers to a failure to act reasonably, which does not meet the threshold of intentional conduct. Simple disagreements and emotional reactions to jokes or pranks do not usually rise to the level of extreme conduct and therefore do not fit the definition of intentional infliction of emotional distress.