Which of the following statements about criminal mischief 3 is true?

The statement that criminal mischief in the third degree does not require intent to damage property is based on the legal definition and framework surrounding this crime. Criminal mischief is typically understood to involve actions that intentionally or recklessly cause damage to another person's property. However, in some jurisdictions, certain forms of criminal mischief can occur without the necessity of a specific intent to damage, meaning that even reckless behaviors could lead to charges under this statute.

The nuances in the law can vary, but this understanding underscores that not all actions that lead to property damage require a person to have an explicit intent to cause that damage. Instead, behaviors that are reckless in nature, albeit not intended to cause harm, may still fall under the definitions of criminal mischief.

In contrast, the other statements suggest either that specific intent is always required, that the crime is limited to vandalism, or that it can involve theft. These contexts are not accurately reflective of the broader definitions encapsulated under criminal mischief laws, which typically encompass a wider range of behaviors and situations.