Which type of mischief requires no intent to damage?

In the context of legal definitions, Criminal Mischief 3 typically encompasses actions where the perpetrator does not have the intent to cause damage but still engages in behavior that results in damage to another person’s property. This implies that the offense can occur even if the individual did not mean to cause harm, distinguishing it from higher degrees of criminal mischief that usually require a clear intent to damage or destruction. This type often involves recklessness or negligence rather than direct intent.

Criminal Mischief 1 and 2 generally involve more severe actions where the offender has a direct intention to cause damage, along with different levels of property value affected or the extent of damage caused. Therefore, these categories would not fit the criteria of requiring no intent to damage. The option "None of the above" is also not correct, as Criminal Mischief 3 fulfills the requirement of lacking intent while still resulting in damage.